Documentation
The procedures themselves — written to the obligations no other standard has
Identify. Control. Involve.
ISO 45001 is the only management system standard MSI works with that tells you who has to be in the room. Consultation and participation of non-managerial workers is a requirement, not a good practice, and it cannot be satisfied from a back office. A safety procedure adapted from a quality template has nowhere to put it.
The same is true of the hierarchy of controls. ISO 45001 states it as a shall with five named levels — so a control resting at administrative or PPE is a position you have to defend with a recorded reason, not a default. Every procedure below is a complete worked document in editable Word, with the record forms, registers and desk-level work instructions included in the price.
Four obligations with no counterpart elsewhere
You can convert a quality procedure into a safety one. What you cannot do is invent the clauses it was never written to carry.
These are the requirements that make ISO 45001 a different document rather than a relabelled one — and they are exactly what is missing when a safety system is built from a manufacturing template.
- 5.4 · Worker participationNon-managerial workers consulted and participating, with barriers removed.
- 6.1.2 · Psychosocial hazardsNamed in the standard, and a documented methodology required for the assessment.
- 8.1.2 · Adapting work to workersA lettered obligation that appears in no other management system standard.
- 8.2 · Emergency responsePlanned, and periodically tested — the testing being what most systems cannot evidence.
Your package counts as the first payment. Buy any documentation package, and if within 30 days you decide you would like MSI working alongside you, 100% of what you paid is credited toward a SurePath implementation, five or more days of consulting or training, or your first year on SureResults. The procedures become the backbone of the work — you do not pay twice for the same documents.
ISO 45001 alone — eleven procedures
For an organization certified to ISO 45001, or building toward it, without another standard in scope.
Job Hazard Identification — Clause 6.1.2, psychosocial hazards included, plus the OSHA written certification no ISO clause asks for$149
Operational Control — the hierarchy of controls as a shall, five named levels, PPE approved only with a recorded reason$149
Emergency Preparedness and Response — Clause 8.2, including the testing obligation most systems cannot evidence$149
Legal Requirements and Evaluation of Compliance — Clauses 6.1.3 and 9.1.2, with worker participation in the evaluation$149
Incident, Nonconformity and Corrective Action — Clause 10.2, incident investigation and the improvement loop in one$149
Leadership and Management Review — Clause 5, carrying non-managerial worker consultation and participation$149
Human Resource Management — competence driven by the hazard determination, plus stop-work and reporting rights$149
Internal Audit — Clause 9.2, testing the hierarchy of controls rather than reviewing documents$149
Purchasing and Supplier Control — contractor management and multi-employer coordination$149
Document and Records Control — creation through withdrawal, including documents of external origin$149
Control of Monitoring and Measuring — Clause 9.1.1 — an exposure reading on uncalibrated kit is a finding$149
Running ISO 14001 as well — the HSE set
Environment and safety in one procedure each. Both standards are criteria-based with no release gate at the end, which is what makes them the natural pair — provided the aspect determination and the hazard determination stay separate and the hierarchy of controls is applied where ISO 45001 requires it. Every divergence is named, decided and recorded.
Running all three — the integrated management system
The hardest set to write: a conformity gate and two criteria-based systems in one procedure. Release stays where ISO 9001 needs it, operating criteria govern the environmental and safety scopes, and neither is quietly folded into the other. Nothing passes on one scope by being tested on another.
Risk, Aspect and Hazard — three registers kept distinct, nineteen divergences recorded$349
Operational Control — a conformity gate and two criteria-based systems in one procedure$349
Evaluation of Compliance — one register, one evaluation habit, one compliance status picture$349
Nonconformity, Corrective Action and Continual Improvement — one loop, three standards, nothing passed on one scope by being tested on another$349
Leadership and Management Review — one review governing quality, environment and safety without collapsing three input sets$349
Human Resource Management — sixteen divergences, the stricter requirement taken each time$349
Internal Audit — one management system audited as one, criteria per standard kept distinct$349
Design and Development — Clause 8.3 with environmental requirements and adapting work to workers as design inputs$349
Purchasing and Supplier Control — supplier effect rated across all three scopes$349
Document and Records Control — one control set for the whole integrated system$349
Control of Monitoring and Measuring — one calibration system serving product release, emissions and exposure$349
