ISO 14001:2026 · Environmental Engineering & Consulting
By Diana Lynn, President and Principal ISO Consultant, MSI · Updated October 25, 2026
Direct Answer
ISO 14001 vs LEED is the difference between certifying one building’s design and certifying how an organization manages environmental performance every day. LEED rates a project. ISO 14001 rates the management system behind the people who design, build and operate projects. Environmental engineering and consulting firms that advise on buildings should understand both, because the client’s results depend on what happens after certification day.
Picture the ribbon-cutting. The plaque is on the lobby wall, the press release is out, and the design team has moved on to the next pursuit.
Eighteen months later the building is using more energy than its model predicted, the commissioning binder is on a shelf nobody opens, and the facility manager who understood the controls has left. Nothing about the plaque changed. Everything about the performance did.
That gap is where the ISO 14001 vs LEED conversation begins, and it is a conversation every environmental engineering and consulting firm should be ready to lead. If your firm advises clients on building ideas, sites and concepts, your clients assume you know the full landscape of environmental tools. Many advisors know LEED inside out. Far fewer can explain where ISO 14001:2026 fits, how it goes beyond a LEED building, and why their own firm might run on it.
This article explains ISO 14001 vs LEED from the advisor’s chair. It is written for principals, project managers and EHS leads at environmental engineering and consulting firms, and it draws on MSI’s 28 years of ISO consulting across manufacturing, technology, medical device, government, healthcare and other regulated industries.
Key Takeaways
- LEED certifies a building or space; ISO 14001 certifies an organization’s environmental management system.
- ISO 14001:2026 Clause 8.1 a) requires controls so environmental requirements are addressed in design and development, considering each life cycle stage.
- Clause 6.1.2 covers aspects an organization can control and those it can influence, which includes the recommendations a consulting firm makes.
- A 2009 National Research Council of Canada re-analysis found 28–35% of LEED buildings studied used more energy than conventional counterparts.
- The two frameworks work best together: LEED sets the project target, ISO 14001 keeps the organization delivering on it.
The Core Difference
What Is the Real Difference in ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Building. System. Results.
Direct Answer
The real difference in ISO 14001 vs LEED is the object being certified. LEED, administered by GBCI, certifies a building or interior against credit thresholds. ISO 14001, certified by accredited certification bodies, verifies that an organization has a management system that identifies its environmental aspects, meets compliance obligations and continually improves.
LEED is a green building rating system created by the U.S. Green Building Council and certified through Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI). A project team documents credits, earns points and receives a certification level.
LEED v5, launched in April 2025, organizes the system around decarbonization, quality of life, and ecological conservation and restoration, according to USGBC’s launch announcement.
ISO 14001 takes a different shape. It does not award points for specific features. The standard itself states that it does not set specific environmental performance criteria. Instead, it requires the organization to determine its context, its environmental aspects, its compliance obligations and its objectives, and then to run, measure, audit, review and improve the processes that deliver them.
Put simply, ISO 14001 vs LEED is a question of what versus how. LEED tells the world what a building achieved. ISO 14001 tells the world how an organization makes sure it keeps achieving. Neither replaces the other.
| Question | LEED (v5) | ISO 14001:2026 |
|---|---|---|
| What is certified? | A building, interior or community project | An organization’s environmental management system (EMS) |
| Who certifies? | GBCI | Certification bodies accredited under IAF member accreditation bodies |
| How is it scored? | Prerequisites plus credits; certification levels by points | Conformity to requirements; no points or levels |
| Performance thresholds? | Yes, defined per credit | No; the organization sets objectives within its own context |
| Timeframe | Certification at a point in time; O+M for operating buildings | Three-year cycle with ongoing surveillance and internal audits |
| Covers the firm’s own operations? | No, only the certified project | Yes, everything inside the declared EMS scope |
| Covers advice and design services? | Indirectly, through the project outcome | Directly, through Clauses 6.1.2 and 8.1 |
Side-by-side view of ISO 14001 vs LEED. Sources: ISO 14001:2026 text; USGBC and GBCI public program descriptions, as of October 2026.
Why Advisors Need Both
Why Should Environmental Consulting Firms Understand ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Advise. Align. Assure.
Environmental engineering and consulting firms sit upstream of almost every environmental outcome a client achieves. They shape site selection, stormwater design, remediation approach, energy modeling, material choices and permitting strategy. When a client asks, “What else should we be thinking about?”, the firm’s answer sets the direction.
Here is the uncomfortable truth. A firm that can only answer in LEED terms leaves the client with a certified building and no system to keep it performing. A firm that understands ISO 14001 vs LEED can tell the client which framework protects the investment over the life of the asset, and how the two connect.
There are three practical reasons the comparison matters to a consulting practice:
- Your clients are often already certified. Manufacturers, utilities, data centers and public agencies frequently hold ISO 14001. When you design for them, your deliverables feed their aspects register, their compliance obligations and their objectives. Speaking their language makes your work easier to adopt.
- Your prequalification depends on it. Owners increasingly ask consultants how they manage their own environmental performance. A certified EMS answers that question with evidence you can look up in IAF CertSearch, rather than with a brochure.
- Your design is your product. Under ISO 14001:2026, the environmental requirements of a product or service must be addressed in design and development. For an engineering firm, the drawing set and the recommendation report are the product.
MSI sees this pattern in engineering-led organizations. Our article on ISO for engineering firms explains how design control under ISO 9001 and environmental control under ISO 14001 reinforce each other, and our guide to ISO for construction shows how the same discipline carries onto the job site.
“If your environmental policy says you will not harm the environment or people, then knowingly exceeding what the science has proven harmful puts you in conflict with your own policy.”
— Diana Lynn, President and Principal ISO Consultant, MSI
After Certification Day
What Happens After the Ribbon-Cutting in ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Measure. Maintain. Improve.
Direct Answer
After the ribbon-cutting, ISO 14001 vs LEED diverge sharply. A design-phase LEED certification reflects what was planned and built, while ISO 14001 requires ongoing monitoring, internal audits, management review and corrective action. That ongoing system is what closes the gap between modeled and measured performance.
Green building researchers have documented the so-called performance gap for years. A 2009 re-analysis by the National Research Council of Canada of measured energy data from 100 LEED-certified commercial and institutional buildings found that, on average, the LEED buildings used less energy than conventional buildings. It also found that 28–35% of them used more. The NRC summary adds that measured performance had little correlation with the energy credits earned at design.
That is not an indictment of LEED. It is a reminder that design intent and operating reality are two different things, and operating reality is governed by people, procedures, maintenance and change. Those are exactly the things a management system controls.
ISO 14001:2026 builds that control in several places:
- Clause 9.1.1 requires the organization to determine what is monitored and measured, the methods, the criteria and indicators, and when results are analyzed. For the ISO 14001 vs LEED comparison, this is the decisive difference. Benchmarking with ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager becomes a controlled process instead of a one-time exercise.
- Clause 9.1.2 requires a process to evaluate compliance with compliance obligations. That matters as more cities adopt building performance standards that apply years after occupancy. See MSI’s guide to evaluation of compliance.
- Clause 6.3, planning of changes, has been elevated to its own clause in the 2026 edition. A tenant fit-out, a controls upgrade or a change of operator is planned rather than discovered.
- Clause 9.3 management review puts environmental performance in front of top management at planned intervals. MSI’s ISO 14001:2026 management review guide shows what that agenda looks like.
This is where ISO 14001 vs LEED stops being a rivalry and becomes a relay. LEED hands off a well-designed asset. ISO 14001 makes sure the organization that operates it keeps running the race.
Design Is Your Product
How Does ISO 14001:2026 Reach Into Design Work in ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Design. Decide. Deliver.
Direct Answer
In ISO 14001 vs LEED, ISO 14001:2026 reaches design work through Clause 8.1 a), which requires controls so environmental requirements are addressed in the design and development process for the product or service, considering each life cycle stage. For a consulting firm, the product is the design or recommendation itself.
This is the clause most environmental consultants have never read, and it is the one that matters most to them. The full set of life cycle requirements in Clause 8.1 says the organization shall:
- establish controls, as appropriate, to ensure its environmental requirements are addressed in the design and development process for the product or service, considering each life cycle stage;
- determine its environmental requirements for the procurement of products and services, as appropriate;
- communicate its relevant environmental requirements to external providers, including contractors;
- consider the need to provide information about potential significant environmental impacts associated with transportation or delivery, use, end-of-life treatment and final disposal of its products and services.
Read that list as an environmental engineering firm. Item a) is your design review.
Item b) is how you specify materials and subconsultants. Item c) is what you hand the contractor. Item d) is the operations guidance you leave with the owner.
A firm with a working EMS already has a process for each one. Our article on the ISO 14001 life cycle perspective walks through each stage in more depth.
Does a life cycle perspective mean a full life cycle assessment?
No. Annex A of ISO 14001:2026 states that a life cycle perspective does not require a detailed life cycle assessment. Thinking carefully about the aspects the organization can control or influence at each stage is sufficient. Firms that do run formal assessments use ISO 14040 and ISO 14044, and MSI’s guide to ISO 14001 lifecycle assessment explains when that level of rigor pays off.
Why does “influence” matter so much for advisors?
Clause 6.1.2 requires the organization to determine the environmental aspects it can control and those it can influence, considering a life cycle perspective. A consultant rarely controls the client’s building. A consultant always influences it. That influence is an environmental aspect, and often a significant one.
MSI’s guide to ISO 14001 environmental aspects shows how to rate influenced aspects with established criteria.
How do climate and ecosystems enter the picture?
Clause 4.1 now states that the external and internal issues an organization determines shall include environmental conditions such as pollution levels, availability of natural resources, climate change, biodiversity or ecosystem health. LEED v5’s emphasis on ecological conservation and restoration points the same direction. For more, see MSI’s articles on ISO 14001 Clause 4.1, environmental conditions and biodiversity in ISO 14001:2026. Climate adaptation work can draw on ISO 14090.
“Protect before you restore. The cheapest health benefit an organization will ever deliver is the harm it never caused to something that was already good.”
— Diana Lynn, President and Principal ISO Consultant, MSI
Original MSI Asset
The LEED-to-ISO 14001 Bridge Table: How Do You Score ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Map. Score. Sustain.
Direct Answer
The LEED-to-ISO 14001 Bridge Table scores ISO 14001 vs LEED project by project. For each LEED v5 impact area, it names the ISO 14001:2026 clause that sustains the result and asks whether that result is certified once or managed continually. Low scores show where performance will drift after handover.
MSI built this table for this article as a working tool for environmental engineering and consulting firms. Use it in a project kickoff, a design review or a client workshop. For each row, score the client’s current state, then add the scores.
| LEED v5 focus | ISO 14001:2026 clause that sustains it | Question to ask the client | Score (0 / 1 / 2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decarbonization: energy and emissions | 6.2 Objectives; 9.1.1 Monitoring and measurement | Who owns the energy target after handover, and how often is it measured? | 0 = no owner · 1 = owner, no metric · 2 = owner, metric, review |
| Decarbonization: refrigerants and equipment | 8.1 Operational control; 7.2 Competence | Are operating criteria and trained staff defined for the systems you designed? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Quality of life: indoor environment | 8.1 Operational control; 9.1.1 | Is indoor monitoring part of a controlled process with action limits? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Ecological conservation and restoration | 4.1 Context; 6.1.2 Aspects | Are biodiversity and ecosystem health in the context and aspects register? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Water and stormwater | 6.1.3 Compliance obligations; 9.1.2 | Is permit compliance evaluated at a set frequency? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Materials and waste | 8.1 b) and c) Procurement and external providers | Are environmental requirements written into purchasing and contractor documents? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Change over the asset’s life | 6.3 Planning of changes | Is a renovation, re-tenanting or operator change planned under a defined process? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
| Leadership attention | 5.1 Leadership; 9.3 Management review | Does top management review environmental performance at planned intervals? | 0 / 1 / 2 |
MSI LEED-to-ISO 14001 Bridge Table. Clause references verified against ISO 14001:2026. LEED v5 focus areas per USGBC, as of October 2026.
How should you read the score?
- 13–16: Managed continually. The client runs a system that will hold the design intent. Your recommendations can plug into it.
- 7–12: Partially managed. Some results are protected and others depend on individuals. Flag the zero-score rows in your design narrative.
- 0–6: Certified once. Performance will likely drift after handover. Recommend a management-system conversation alongside the LEED scope.
The table does two jobs at once. It makes the ISO 14001 vs LEED comparison concrete for the client, and it gives your firm a defensible, documented way to show that your advice considered the full life cycle, which is exactly what Clause 8.1 a) asks of you.
Newly Released · ISO 14001:2026
Train the People Who Verify the System Works: ISO 14001:2026 Internal Auditing
The scorecard tells you where a system is weak; trained internal auditors tell you whether it is actually working. MSI’s newly released ISO 14001:2026 Internal Auditing course is self-paced and online, fulfills the 16-hour (two-day) internal auditor training requirement, and teaches every updated 2026 clause, including 4.1, 6.3 and 8.1. Built from 200+ audits attended, it is $1,137 with a three-payment option.
Inside Your Own Firm
What Does ISO 14001 vs LEED Look Like Inside a Consulting Firm?
Practice. Prove. Persuade.
The second half of the ISO 14001 vs LEED story is about the consulting firm itself. LEED has nothing to say about how a consultancy runs. ISO 14001 does, because a consultancy has environmental aspects of its own, and some of them are significant.
Typical aspects MSI sees in environmental engineering and consulting practices include:
- Travel and field mobilization. Site visits, sampling trips and vehicle fleets. MSI applies this to itself: how MSI travels affects climate change, and MSI is very considerate of the travel choices it makes.
- Field and laboratory waste. Investigation-derived waste, sample containers, preservatives and decontamination fluids.
- Subcontracted work. Drillers, laboratories, surveyors and remediation contractors are externally provided processes that must be controlled or influenced under Clause 8.1. See MSI’s guide to ISO 14001 externally provided processes.
- The advice itself. Recommendations, specifications and designs that shape a client’s impacts for decades. This is the influenced aspect that should rank highest.
- Emergency situations. Spills during sampling, utility strikes during drilling, and field-crew response under Clause 8.2.
A firm that manages these aspects through a working EMS has a stronger story in every pursuit. It can show its own environmental policy, objectives and results. It can show how its subconsultants are controlled. And it can show the same discipline it recommends to clients.
MSI’s overview of ISO certification for service companies explains why service firms often find the standard easier to implement than they expect.
Many firms also hold ISO 9001 for design control. An integrated ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 system lets one design review, one document control process and one internal audit cover both quality and environmental requirements.
Requirements Versus Advice
Which ISO 14001 vs LEED Items Are Required and Which Are Recommended?
Read. Label. Apply.
Accuracy matters when you advise clients on a standard. ISO 14001:2026 uses “shall” for requirements. A NOTE is for consideration and creates no obligation.
Annex A is informative and adds no requirements. The table below labels each item this article relies on.
| Item | Clause | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Include environmental conditions such as climate change, biodiversity or ecosystem health in context | 4.1 | Requirement |
| Consider ability to exercise control and influence over the life cycle when setting scope | 4.3 e) | Requirement |
| Policy commitment to protection of the environment, including prevention of pollution | 5.2 c) | Requirement |
| Examples of other policy commitments (e.g., climate change mitigation and adaptation) | 5.2 NOTE | NOTE (not an obligation) |
| Determine aspects you can control and those you can influence, with a life cycle perspective | 6.1.2 | Requirement |
| Carry out changes to the EMS in a planned manner | 6.3 | Requirement |
| Controls so environmental requirements are addressed in design and development for each life cycle stage | 8.1 a) | Requirement |
| Communicate environmental requirements to external providers, including contractors | 8.1 c) | Requirement |
| A life cycle perspective does not require a detailed life cycle assessment | Annex A | Informative guidance |
| Evaluate compliance at a determined frequency | 9.1.2 | Requirement |
| Pursue LEED certification on client projects | — | Not an ISO requirement (client or owner decision) |
| Use the LEED-to-ISO 14001 Bridge Table in design reviews | — | MSI recommendation |
Status labels verified against ISO 14001:2026 (fourth edition, published April 2026).
The Client Conversation
How Should Consultants Explain ISO 14001 vs LEED to Clients?
Ask. Explain. Elevate.
Clients rarely need a lecture on management systems. They need a clear answer to “Will this building keep performing?” A firm that understands ISO 14001 vs LEED can answer that in five questions, asked at kickoff or at the 30% design review:
- Who in your organization will own the environmental performance of this asset after we hand it over?
- Do you already hold ISO 14001, or another management system that our design should plug into?
- Which compliance obligations will apply during operation, including any local building performance standard?
- How will changes such as renovations, new tenants or a new operator be planned and reviewed?
- Does top management review environmental results, and should this asset’s data be in that review?
In ISO 14001 vs LEED terms, those questions do not compete with the LEED scope. They protect it. They also position your firm as the advisor who thinks past certification day, which is a strong differentiator in pursuits where every competitor lists the same LEED Accredited Professionals.
Clients who report through ESG frameworks will recognize the value immediately. MSI’s articles on ISO and ESG integration, environmental risk as business risk and data center sustainability show how management-system evidence supports disclosure. For broader context on what an EMS is, the U.S. EPA environmental management systems page is a neutral starting point to share with clients.
“I have always felt that integrity is at the center of all ISO standards.”
— Diana Lynn, President and Principal ISO Consultant, MSI
Getting Started
How Does a Consulting Firm Act on ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Start. Structure. Sustain.
Direct Answer
To act on ISO 14001 vs LEED, a consulting firm starts by reviewing its own environmental aspects, including the influence of its advice, then builds design controls under Clause 8.1, trains internal auditors and holds a management review. Firms already certified to ISO 14001:2015 must transition to the 2026 edition by April 2029.
MSI recommends a practical sequence that most firms can begin in a single quarter:
- Start with an “End in Mind” management review. Put the data you already have on the review slides, mark missing data “TBD” with dates, and let the gaps define the plan. MSI’s ISO Management Review Toolkits provide the agenda and inputs.
- Build an aspects register that includes influence. Rate your recommendations and designs as influenced aspects, not only your office and fleet.
- Write design controls for Clause 8.1 a). Add environmental checkpoints for each life cycle stage to your existing design review. The Bridge Table above is a ready starting point.
- Control your subconsultants. Put environmental requirements into subcontracts and field procedures under Clause 8.1 b) and c).
- Train internal auditors on the 2026 edition. Internal audits are how you learn whether the system works in practice. MSI’s case for an ISO 14001 internal auditor explains why.
- Plan the transition. As of October 2026, MSI advises certified organizations to complete the move from ISO 14001:2015 to ISO 14001:2026 by April 2029. See MSI’s ISO 2026 transition deadline guide, the free ISO Transition Risk Scorecard and the ISO 14001 transition cost breakdown.
MSI has spent 28 years helping organizations build management systems that work in practice, with 80+ certifications supported, 200+ audits attended and 600+ professionals trained. Having attended those audits, MSI has seen many findings first-hand from the registrar’s point of view, and that perspective shapes every environmental system MSI helps build. Call 760-434-9141 for a planning session.
Globally, ISO 14001 is one of the most widely certified management system standards, as the ISO Survey of certifications shows each year. For an environmental engineering or consulting firm, that means many of your clients, competitors and subcontractors already operate under it. Understanding ISO 14001 vs LEED is no longer optional knowledge for an advisor.
Clearing the Air
What Are the Common Myths About ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Myth. Fact. Forward.
- Myth: A LEED Platinum building means the owner has an environmental management system. Fact: LEED certifies the project. Whether the owner manages environmental performance afterward is a separate question that ISO 14001 answers.
- Myth: ISO 14001 is only for factories. Fact: The standard applies to any organization. Service firms, including engineering and consulting practices, certify to it every year.
- Myth: ISO 14001 requires a formal life cycle assessment. Fact: Annex A states a life cycle perspective does not require a detailed life cycle assessment.
- Myth: Choosing one means skipping the other. Fact: The two frameworks reinforce each other. ISO 14001 vs LEED is about roles, not a contest.
- Myth: Once certified, the system runs itself. Fact: Systems deteriorate when no one acts on what the records report. MSI’s SureResults ISO Maintenance Program exists for exactly that reason.
Where to Go From Here
What Is the Next Step After Learning ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Choose. Commit. Continue.
Wherever your firm is today, there is a clear next step. Each option below is built from MSI’s 28 years of ISO 14001 consulting experience.
Already Certified to ISO 14001:2015?
Update Your EMS to 2026 in About a Week
The ISO 14001:2026 Procedure Templates & Guides bundle was built to help experienced EHS managers update their current ISO 14001:2015 system to the 2026 edition in a week’s time, including the design, procurement and change controls covered in this article.
Building a System From Scratch?
Start From MSI’s ISO Procedure Templates & Guides Hub
Browse every MSI procedure template and guide in one place, organized by standard, so your firm can see exactly what a working EMS or integrated system requires before you commit.
Newly Released · Train Your Auditors
ISO 14001:2026 Internal Auditing: Self-Paced, 16-Hour Equivalent
Give your EHS lead or project managers the skills to audit design controls, influenced aspects and subconsultant controls against the 2026 edition. Online, self-paced, and built from MSI’s 200+ audits attended.
Leading the Change?
Walk Your Team Through Every ISO 14001:2026 Change
The ISO 14001:2026 Transition course explains what changed from 2015, including Clause 4.1 environmental conditions and the elevated planning-of-changes clause, so leadership can plan the move with confidence.
Running Management Review?
Put Environmental Performance in Front of Leadership
MSI’s Q/EMS 914MR Management Review Tool Kit covers ISO 9001 and ISO 14001 together, so one review shows leadership quality and environmental results side by side.
Want to Talk It Through?
Book a Free Planning Session: 760-434-9141
Tell MSI where your firm stands, and leave with a practical plan for ISO 14001 or an integrated system. Prefer to see the full path first? Review SurePath implementation or MSI internal audit services.
FAQ
ISO 14001 vs LEED: Frequently Asked Questions
Ask. Answer. Act.
What is the main difference in ISO 14001 vs LEED?
The main difference in ISO 14001 vs LEED is scope. LEED certifies a building or space against credit thresholds, while ISO 14001 certifies an organization’s environmental management system, which governs how it identifies aspects, meets compliance obligations and continually improves.
Can a firm use ISO 14001 vs LEED together?
Yes. ISO 14001 vs LEED is not an either-or choice. LEED sets project-level targets, and ISO 14001 provides the organizational system that keeps those targets managed through operation, change and staff turnover.
Why should environmental consultants know ISO 14001 vs LEED?
Environmental consultants should know ISO 14001 vs LEED because their designs and recommendations shape client impacts for decades. ISO 14001:2026 Clause 8.1 a) treats design as a controlled process considering each life cycle stage.
Does ISO 14001 vs LEED change under the 2026 edition?
ISO 14001 vs LEED comparisons now reflect ISO 14001:2026, published in April 2026, which adds environmental conditions such as climate change and biodiversity to Clause 4.1 and elevates planning of changes to Clause 6.3. LEED v5 launched in April 2025.
Is ISO 14001 vs LEED relevant to small consulting firms?
Yes. ISO 14001 vs LEED matters to small firms because the standard scales to any size. A small consultancy’s most significant aspect is often the influence of its advice, which a lean EMS can control.
How long does ISO 14001 certification take for a consulting firm?
Timelines vary with scope and existing systems. MSI client experience suggests that firms with ISO 9001 design control in place move faster, because one integrated system covers both. A free planning session at 760-434-9141 gives a realistic estimate.
References & Authoritative Sources
- ISO 14001:2026, Environmental management systems: Requirements with guidance for use (ISO)
- ISO 14040:2006, Life cycle assessment: Principles and framework (ISO)
- ISO 14044:2006, Life cycle assessment: Requirements and guidelines (ISO)
- ISO 14090, Adaptation to climate change (ISO)
- The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certifications (ISO)
- LEED v5 (U.S. Green Building Council)
- USGBC launches LEED v5, April 28, 2025 (Business Wire)
- Green Business Certification Inc. (GBCI)
- Are green buildings better buildings? (National Research Council Canada)
- Most LEED-certified buildings save energy, but not all (ACHR News, 2009)
- Benchmark your building with Portfolio Manager (ENERGY STAR)
- Building Performance Standards (U.S. Department of Energy)
- Environmental Management Systems (U.S. EPA)
- IAF CertSearch: global database of accredited certifications (IAF)
About Management Systems International (MSI)
Diana Lynn, President and Principal ISO Consultant at Management Systems International (MSI), a consulting firm she co-founded in 1998. With 28 years of experience including extensive AS9100 work in MSI’s early years, MSI’s track record includes 80+ certifications supported, 200+ audits attended, and 600+ professionals trained across manufacturing, technology, medical device, government, healthcare, and other regulated industries. Today MSI implements ISO 9001, ISO 13485, ISO 14001, and ISO 45001, with an expanding focus on ISO 7101 healthcare quality.
Veteran-owned and female-owned. About MSI · msi-international.com · 760-434-9141
